Since they entered office the blue-tinged contingent of the Coalition has been engaged in a systematic process of stigmatising those in receipt of social security benefits. Great emphasis has been placed upon the undeserving and the fraudulent. There is support for the hard working strivers, but condemnation for the skivers. The spotlight has been on the most extreme cases of households receiving substantial financial support from social security in order to create a smoke screen for cuts in benefits to the poorest. The Tories are convinced that welfare “reform” – particularly the overall weekly benefit cap – is their most popular policy. Yet many of the components of this policy have yet to be fully implemented. The general public has yet to grasp their full impact. It may transpire that once they do, the Tories will feel they acted precipitately in drawing such a positive conclusion. Continue Reading →
From the archives ...
[Originally posted on The Policy Press Blog, 23/12/10]
The analysis of continuity and change is a preoccupation for scholars of the policy process. While a range of frameworks have been [...]
[Originally posted on Liberal Democrat Voice, 22/02/11, and ranked most read post of the week]
Are the Liberal Democrats a party of untrammelled ideology – sorry,“principles” – or do ethics [...]
The bod who did the typing …
Download for free …
Receive my posts by email:
The balance of (what’s on) my mind:
What I’ve mostly been typing about:
Currently popular posts
- Shared ownership and the changing reality of middle income Britain
- Uncertain terrain: issues and challenges facing housing associations
- Curbing the welfare hate
- Who is social housing for, and who should it be for?
- Housing associations and the impacts of welfare reform
- The policy con is on: Welfare and workfare in Cameron’s Britain
- Is financial innovation a good idea?
- Morality, tax and tax morale