Archive | Other gubbins RSS feed for this section

Unfollowing

Blue bird sitting on ropeThe received wisdom is that unfollowing someone on Twitter is of no great significance. It can be done with breezy indifference. And it will be treated in the same way by the person being unfollowed. They probably won’t even notice.

It’s not like unfriending someone on Facebook. That’s a weapon. It can be interpreted as a serious slight or a declaration of war.

A couple of years ago when talking to someone new to Twitter I said “Just do your own thing. If people like it they’ll stay, if they don’t they’ll go. It doesn’t matter too much”. And just because they follow you you aren’t obliged to follow back.

But is that right? Continue Reading →

Share
0 Comments
  • The perversity of the politics of housing
  • Selling justice by the pound
  • The enemies of liberty
  • Shared ownership and changing reality of middle income Britain
  • Boris the Eurorealist?
  • On inconsistencies in policy thinking
Share
0 Comments

Keeping up with the Bristol Bloggerati

funny man working in the cloudBristol has a lively bunch of bloggers. Keeping up with what’s being posted can be a bit of a struggle.

We now have a new resource in the form of www.bristolblogs.com. Bristol Blogs brings together more than 80 different feeds from bloggers in and around Bristol, blogging about life and events in the city and about a huge range of other topics. The site is already up and running. It is currently carrying over 3,500 posts.

My posts appear under the academia and politics headings. But you know where to find me already. Why not visit the site and find out what everyone else is talking about?

Share
0 Comments

The Q#1 quintet

Here are the five posts published on this blog between January and March 2013 that recorded the most hits:

  1. Help to buy? (20th March)
  2. The politics of the bedroom tax (9th February)
  3. Clegg courts catastrophe (10th March)
  4. Research and the policy process (13th February)
  5. The boundaries of academic blogging (20th January)

This quarter has seen 3 of the 4 busiest months since the blog started. I’m glad that people are continuing to find these ramblings of some interest. Onward and upward!

Thanks for reading. And commenting. Even when you’re disagreeing with me.

Image: © iQoncept – Fotolia.com

Share
0 Comments

Will your autotweeting twin be a turbo-troll?

Blue bird tweets and sings on smartphoneToday’s Independent carries a piece on LivesOn, a piece of software currently under development. LivesOn aims to analyse your tweets and then tweet on your behalf in your style on the topics you tweet about. So you can live on online, even after your demise IRL.

The idea of post-death tweeting would appear to be a bit of a gimmick to attract attention. It clearly worked.

Perhaps the most interesting comment in the article came towards the end. Dave Bedwood, a creative working at an ad agency heavily involved in social media, commented:

Artificial intelligence is the holy grail of computer science but what we want at first is to create a really useful tool for people living now. It would be your twin, posting the sorts of things you’re interested in so you can go off and use your time more wisely.

That got me thinking. How much do you automate online? Continue Reading →

Share
0 Comments

Going solo or joining someone else’s show

[First posted at LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog, 18/02/13]

It’s pretty difficult to miss the message that the engaged academic should be reaching beyond the academy to communicate with broader publics. And blogging and tweeting have attracted plenty of attention as powerful social media through which to foster public engagement.

You’ve heard the message. You’re willing to give it a go. But Twitter appears be a whole different world to the one you’re used to. How on earth can you say anything meaningful in 140 characters, when you’re used to laying out an argument meticulously over several thousand words? You have colleagues who are very positive about the possibilities of Twitter, but it feels like a step too far at the moment. Blogging, on the other hand, doesn’t sound too bad. At least you’ve got a bit of space to say something sensible. So what happens next? You’re faced with two choices: You can go solo or you can get involved with someone else’s show.

Blog

Continue Reading →

Share
0 Comments

Travels through Coalitionland: Notes of disquiet and dissent

CoalitionlandfpThe formation of a coalition between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats was probably the only viable outcome of the General Election in May 2010. A coalition between two unnatural bedfellows in the public interest looked like the only plausible way forward.

Coalition was always going to be a journey that carried risks. It is rarely kind to the junior partner. The history of Tory-Liberal coalitions in Westminster is not an entirely happy one, especially for the Liberals.

The nature of the Coalition’s political agenda became apparent fairly soon after it was formed. Criticism and protest swiftly developed in response. My response was to engage with the agenda online. I have been blogging about political developments under the Coalition since 2010. Continue Reading →

Share
1 Comment

Name a book that changed your life

Earlier this evening Umair Haque tweeted:

 

My response was:

If anyone ever asks me a question like this I always respond with Stewart’s book, even though I can hardly remember what it says anymore.

Having tweeted, it all went a bit Proustian. Memories of the book, when and where I read it, came flooding back. And I considered whether I could really say it changed my life. Continue Reading →

Share
1 Comment

The boundaries of academic blogging Mk II

funny man working in the cloudAn edited version of last weekend’s post on the boundaries of academic blogging has been published today on the LSE Impact of the Social Sciences blog.

You can find it here.

Share
0 Comments

The boundaries of academic blogging

3d Graduate writes a blogWe live in a world of impact and engagement. Academics are encouraged to embrace social media and communicate in new and different ways to broader audiences. More academics should be getting acquainted with WordPress or Blogger, Typepad, Posterous or Tumblr. The world needs to know what’s happening within the academy. We’ve got interesting ideas and findings to share. And if the world is going to grasp what’s happening then our writing needs to be clear and digestible.

The spin-off benefits that this can have for one’s own teaching and research have been admirably summarised by Simon Wren-Lewis on his excellent blog Mainly Macro.

I have to confess that I am not quite as comfortable with this whole idea as I might be. Not with the idea of academics getting involved in blogging. That’s fine by me. My issue is more with the idea of “academic blogging”. Where does it begin and end?

I am an academic. Have been for many years. Can’t deny it. In that world I am Professor of Public Policy. I’m the head of one of the five Schools in the Faculty of Social Sciences and Law at one of Britain’s leading universities.

And I am a blogger. I have been for a few years now. In this world I write this blog on politics and policy-related issues. I occasionally contribute to political blogs elsewhere. This blog is currently ranked in the top 100 UK politics blogs by ebuzzing.

Many people arrive and depart this blog without knowing that I’m an academic. I don’t hide the fact. It’s there on the About page. But I don’t give it any particular prominence. Similarly, I don’t mention it on my Twitter biog.

Of course, these two identities – academic and blogger – overlap considerably. But they aren’t entirely congruent. And that can set up tensions. Continue Reading →

Share
5 Comments